Hands and Results
1 |
♠63
♥Q
♦JT9532
♣AKT6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠T7
♥A42
♦K8764
♣J97
|
♠AKQ2
♥T9873
♦A
♣432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 ♦Q A7-Gaucher-Cooney vs A3-Spence-Krukoff
100 1.00 1.00 2♦* S -1 ♠K A6-Mortin-Dunitz vs A5-Rankin-McLeod
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ E ♦Q A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A1-Fluter-Nattrass
|
| AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis
North opens with a 2♦
preempt (maybe even 3♦
!), but East can still get in there with a 2♥
bid (or a double; over 3♦
it's harder!), so South passes. West isn't real wild about all their ♦
, but they probably do bump to 3♥
, and that looks like it might be the end of it. Unfortunately for declarer, their combined point are just not deployed in a very effective manner, as the defense can take 3♣
and 2♥
- and even if South leads an unfortunate ♦
, they should be able to prevent declarer from taking a profitable pitch on the ♦
K.
**************************************** Comments? Questions?
CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion. CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com
|
2 |
♠QJ876
♥6
♦QJT7
♣AT2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠4
♥Q74
♦K84
♣QJ9876
|
♠AK532
♥AKT8
♦962
♣3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ E ♣3 A7-Gaucher-Cooney vs A3-Spence-Krukoff
140 0.50 1.50 2♥ E +1 ♠T A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A1-Fluter-Nattrass
140 0.50 1.50 2♥ E +1 ♦A A6-Mortin-Dunitz vs A5-Rankin-McLeod
|
| AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis
East opens 1♠
, South passes, and West starts with a semi-forcing 1NT. North stays out of it, so when East rebids 2♥
, that looks like the end of the auction. Not a whole lot works out well for declarer here, but they should be able to make this contract. This might be a good hand to look at in terms of winners rather than losers - declarer can take 2♠
and 1♦
and then should be able to separate the ♠
out enough to take 5 more tricks there (3 top and 2 ruffs.)
**************************************** Comments? Questions?
CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion. CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com
|
3 |
♠KQT4
♥9862
♦A83
♣K4
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠A73
♥53
♦2
♣AJ98732
|
♠95
♥KJT7
♦J9764
♣Q6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.50 0.50 4♠ S ♦2 A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A1-Fluter-Nattrass
420 1.50 0.50 4♠ S ♣A A7-Gaucher-Cooney vs A3-Spence-Krukoff
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ N +2 ♦2 A6-Mortin-Dunitz vs A5-Rankin-McLeod
|
| AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis
South opens 1♦
, so West likely overcalls 3♣
(we wouldn't usually like to preempt with 2 Aces, but the opponents opened this time, so we're less worried about finding partner with stuff.) North has enough to make a Negative Double , though, so after East passes, South can show their ♠
with 3♠
. North likes that and raises to 4♠
. West may well try to lead their singleton ♦
, but that won't stop declarer from losing just 1♠
, 1♥
, and 1♣
.
**************************************** Comments? Questions?
CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion. CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com
|
4 |
♠A7652
♥J86
♦A9
♣AT8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠Q9
♥K
♦Q54
♣KQ97542
|
♠T8
♥AT9543
♦T63
♣J3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥4 ♠0 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♥A A7-Gaucher-Cooney vs A3-Spence-Krukoff
200 1.00 1.00 3♠ N +2 ♥A A6-Mortin-Dunitz vs A5-Rankin-McLeod
110 0.00 2.00 3♣ W ♥6 A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A1-Fluter-Nattrass
|
| AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis
West opens 1♣
, and North overcalls 1♠
. East would have liked to be able to make a weak jump shift to 2♥
, but now that it would have to be 3♥
, they probably just pass instead. South shows a limit raise or better with a 2♣
cuebid, so North either just goes to game or maybe makes some kind of help suit try with 3♣
- but in any event, it seems like NS wind up in 4♠
. Those top 2 ♥
are really the only concern (after finding the ♠
Q, but "8 ever, 9 never" pays off here, even in the face of a preempt) - and even those may wind up getting pitched on ♦
if the defense can't figure out how to get back and forth (or, of course, West could get a ♥
ruff.)
**************************************** Comments? Questions?
CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion. CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com
|
5 |
♠K9
♥874
♦8543
♣Q854
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠A864
♥KQ
♦KQ762
♣93
|
♠QT
♥AT952
♦JT9
♣J62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 2.00 0.00 1♠ S ♣9 A7-Gaucher-Cooney vs A6-Mortin-Dunitz
110 1.00 1.00 2♦ W +1 ♠K A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A2-Keim-Larrivee
150 0.00 2.00 3♦ W +2 ♠K A5-Rankin-McLeod vs A3-Spence-Krukoff
|
| AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis
North passes, East passes, and South opens 1♠
. West overcalls 2♦
, so North just passes, and East is a little torn, but as they're a passed hand and their bid can't be forcing, they might try to introduce 2♥
- but if they feel like they can't do that, they'll just raise to 3♦
. 2♥
might convince West to take another bid (which would be bad), and 3♦
likely just gets a pass. Let's say they play 3♦
. North might make the really unfortunate lead of the ♠
K, which would leave declarer with just 1♦
and 2♣
to lose - but they do deserve to also lose a ♠
.
**************************************** Comments? Questions?
CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion. CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com
|
6 |
♠A96
♥AJ98
♦AT965
♣Q
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠T5
♥432
♦J7
♣AKJ854
|
♠KQ8743
♥5
♦K42
♣T97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣3 ♠4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♣K A5-Rankin-McLeod vs A3-Spence-Krukoff
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ S ♣A A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A2-Keim-Larrivee
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ S ♣A A7-Gaucher-Cooney vs A6-Mortin-Dunitz
|
| AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis
East preempts 2♠
, so South passes, West passes, and when this comes to North, they overcall 3♦
. South then has to decide whether a 3♥
response is warranted (again, it's tough in these competitive auctions!). If South decides yes, North will certainly raise to 4♥
. But it's not at all wild to think South might just pass, especially since partner is balancing! Ever the optimists, let's assume we get to 4♥
. Pleasantly, East has the ♦
K, so declarer just loses 1♠
, 1♦
, and 1♣
.
**************************************** Comments? Questions?
CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion. CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com
|
7 |
♠AQ95
♥Q8532
♦J83
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠83
♥A7
♦AQ962
♣T652
|
♠6
♥KJ964
♦T4
♣AKQ97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣0 ♦2 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 ♠J A5-Rankin-McLeod vs A3-Spence-Krukoff
100 1.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♠3 A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A2-Keim-Larrivee
620 0.00 2.00 5♣ E +1 ♥T A7-Gaucher-Cooney vs A6-Mortin-Dunitz
|
| AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis
South gets to do the preempting this time with 2♠
. West keeps quiet, so North goes right for 4♠
, which leaves East to make a 4NT takeout bid (showing at least 2 places to play.) West can handle ♣
(they should start with the cheapest thing they would be willing to play in), so they bid 5♣
. Since that's one of East's suits, they pass, and here we are. So this preempt has put EW in a decent but not the best place they could play. In 5♣
, they only lose the 1♠
(finessing North for the ♥
Q shouldn't be hard to figure out - although they do need to deal with the ♥
before they pull too many trump.)
**************************************** Comments? Questions?
CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion. CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com
|
8 |
♠J2
♥T6
♦A5
♣KQ87653
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠Q54
♥AK975
♦QT72
♣T
|
♠96
♥43
♦KJ9843
♣J92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♠ 4NT ♦4 ♥6 |
EW: 3♦ ♣2 ♥5 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
520 2.00 0.00 3N S +4 ♦2 A7-Gaucher-Cooney vs A6-Mortin-Dunitz
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ S ♥K A5-Rankin-McLeod vs A3-Spence-Krukoff
200 0.00 2.00 3♠ S +2 ♥A A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A2-Keim-Larrivee
|
| AiB Team - Robert Todd and Theri Andino Hand Analysis
West opens 1♣
(giving themselves a little boost for the shape), and so North overcalls 3♣
. East stays quiet, but South can still bid a forcing 3♠
. North does have a doubleton honor, so they bid 4♠
, and that should be it. This actually works out quite well - declarer loses 1♠
and 2♥
, but as long as they don't ruff a ♥
low when West leads the ♥
A-♥
K-small ♥
, they'll be fine.
**************************************** Comments? Questions?
CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion. CLICK HERE or email me directly at robert@advinbridge.com
|
9 |
♠KJ76
♥AK6
♦K653
♣Q9
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠QT852
♥93
♦J2
♣KT63
|
♠A943
♥QJ7
♦AQT8
♣85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦6/5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦7/6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♠* W -1 ♥A A1-Fluter-Nattrass vs A7-Gaucher-Cooney
170 1.00 1.00 2♥ N +2 ♠A A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A3-Spence-Krukoff
100 0.00 2.00 3♣ N -2 ♣8 A2-Keim-Larrivee vs A5-Rankin-McLeod
|
| |
10 |
♠AKQ2
♥AT72
♦K6
♣A96
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠JT76
♥J98
♦5
♣KT832
|
♠543
♥3
♦JT98742
♣54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 7♥ 6♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥0 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1470 1.50 0.50 6N S +1 ♣3 A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A3-Spence-Krukoff
1470 1.50 0.50 6N N +1 ♦J A2-Keim-Larrivee vs A5-Rankin-McLeod
1460 0.00 2.00 6♥ S +1 ♠J A1-Fluter-Nattrass vs A7-Gaucher-Cooney
|
| |
11 |
♠KQ94
♥JT86
♦975
♣KJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠JT7632
♥KQ4
♦Q3
♣A6
|
♠85
♥A752
♦A42
♣9542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠5/6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2♠ W -1 ♥J A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A3-Spence-Krukoff
100 1.00 1.00 5♦ S -2 ♣A A2-Keim-Larrivee vs A5-Rankin-McLeod
150 0.00 2.00 3N N -3 ♠8 A1-Fluter-Nattrass vs A7-Gaucher-Cooney
|
| |
12 |
♠AT4
♥JT6
♦652
♣KJ53
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠9853
♥Q3
♦AJT
♣AT86
|
♠KQ2
♥A9875
♦Q973
♣4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 5♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2N E -1 ♣2 A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A3-Spence-Krukoff
110 1.00 1.00 1♠ W +1 ♣3 A2-Keim-Larrivee vs A5-Rankin-McLeod
200 0.00 2.00 3♠ W +2 ♥J A1-Fluter-Nattrass vs A7-Gaucher-Cooney
|
| |
13 |
♠KQT52
♥K54
♦J9
♣A72
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠A874
♥A
♦Q8
♣KQ9653
|
♠J93
♥QJ73
♦AK654
♣J
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3/4♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N W ♠K A7-Gaucher-Cooney vs A5-Rankin-McLeod
630 1.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♣2 A2-Keim-Larrivee vs A1-Fluter-Nattrass
660 0.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♠K A3-Spence-Krukoff vs A6-Mortin-Dunitz
|
| |
14 |
♠Q6
♥J32
♦Q2
♣QT9765
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠K754
♥T5
♦KT9654
♣4
|
♠AT2
♥874
♦A873
♣J83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♣4 A3-Spence-Krukoff vs A6-Mortin-Dunitz
450 1.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♣4 A7-Gaucher-Cooney vs A5-Rankin-McLeod
230 0.00 2.00 3♥ S +3 ♣4 A2-Keim-Larrivee vs A1-Fluter-Nattrass
|
| |
15 |
♠T4
♥AJ954
♦K986
♣KJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠KQJ93
♥T7
♦T42
♣T82
|
♠8752
♥K832
♦3
♣7653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 6♥ 5NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣1 ♦1 ♥1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 1.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♠K A2-Keim-Larrivee vs A1-Fluter-Nattrass
660 1.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♠K A3-Spence-Krukoff vs A6-Mortin-Dunitz
650 0.00 2.00 4♥ N +1 ♠7 A7-Gaucher-Cooney vs A5-Rankin-McLeod
|
| |
16 |
♠KQ7642
♥62
♦4
♣J643
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠93
♥AQJ43
♦AT532
♣A
|
♠J85
♥T97
♦Q6
♣KQ875
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♠ -/1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥3/4 NT6/7 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 5♥ W -2 ♠K A2-Keim-Larrivee vs A1-Fluter-Nattrass
100 1.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♠K A3-Spence-Krukoff vs A6-Mortin-Dunitz
620 0.00 2.00 4♥ W ♦4 A7-Gaucher-Cooney vs A5-Rankin-McLeod
|
| |
17 |
♠J72
♥T73
♦T986
♣987
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠Q963
♥K
♦AK
♣AQT654
|
♠AT8
♥AJ52
♦QJ54
♣32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0/1 ♦0 ♥3 ♠1 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 7/6♦ 4♥ 6♠ 7/6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 1♥* S -2 ♦A A1-Fluter-Nattrass vs A6-Mortin-Dunitz
490 0.50 1.50 3N E +3 ♥6 A3-Spence-Krukoff vs A2-Keim-Larrivee
490 0.50 1.50 3N E +3 ♥6 A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A5-Rankin-McLeod
|
| |
18 |
♠A8753
♥T
♦92
♣A9742
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠QT2
♥75432
♦K653
♣5
|
♠J
♥Q96
♦AQJT74
♣KQ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 4♦ E -2 ♥A A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A5-Rankin-McLeod
100 1.50 0.50 4♦ E -2 ♥K A3-Spence-Krukoff vs A2-Keim-Larrivee
50 0.00 2.00 4♦ E -1 ♥K A1-Fluter-Nattrass vs A6-Mortin-Dunitz
|
| |
19 |
♠A8763
♥-
♦AT9
♣AQJ64
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠K5
♥AK92
♦KQJ84
♣T7
|
♠T9
♥QT84
♦76532
♣53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 1♥ 7♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: -/1♦ ♣0 ♦6/7 ♥6 ♠0 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 2.00 0.00 4♠ N +3 ♥4 A1-Fluter-Nattrass vs A6-Mortin-Dunitz
480 0.50 1.50 4♠ N +2 ♥4 A3-Spence-Krukoff vs A2-Keim-Larrivee
480 0.50 1.50 4♠ N +2 ♦7 A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A5-Rankin-McLeod
|
| |
20 |
♠T76
♥75
♦AJ98
♣QT85
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠AQ9
♥AK98
♦KT73
♣63
|
♠K532
♥JT64
♦-
♣KJ972
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥1 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4/5♣ 1♦ 6♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♥ W +2 ♥A A1-Fluter-Nattrass vs A6-Mortin-Dunitz
680 0.50 1.50 4♥ W +2 ♣5 A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A5-Rankin-McLeod
680 0.50 1.50 4♥ E +2 ♣A A3-Spence-Krukoff vs A2-Keim-Larrivee
|
| |
21 |
♠KQJ
♥73
♦AKT92
♣973
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠A62
♥QJ54
♦J8
♣J864
|
♠T75
♥982
♦Q
♣AKQT52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 1♥ 3♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦1 ♥6 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.00 1.00 4♦ N +2 ♣A A2-Keim-Larrivee vs A7-Gaucher-Cooney
170 1.00 1.00 4♦ N +2 ♣A A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A6-Mortin-Dunitz
170 1.00 1.00 3♦ N +3 ♣A A5-Rankin-McLeod vs A1-Fluter-Nattrass
|
| |
22 |
♠AJ2
♥K63
♦AK82
♣J83
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠65
♥T5
♦QJ9764
♣T52
|
♠QT3
♥AQ974
♦T5
♣764
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 5/3♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♥T A5-Rankin-McLeod vs A1-Fluter-Nattrass
400 1.00 1.00 3N N ♥7 A2-Keim-Larrivee vs A7-Gaucher-Cooney
100 0.00 2.00 5♠ S -2 ♥T A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A6-Mortin-Dunitz
|
| |
23 |
♠843
♥K98654
♦KJ
♣95
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠Q652
♥2
♦QT986
♣A63
|
♠KJ
♥QJT
♦52
♣KQJT84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 3♥ N ♣K A5-Rankin-McLeod vs A1-Fluter-Nattrass
140 1.50 0.50 2♥ N +1 ♣K A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A6-Mortin-Dunitz
100 0.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♠2 A2-Keim-Larrivee vs A7-Gaucher-Cooney
|
| |
24 |
♠87
♥AT985432
♦3
♣75
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠KT4
♥6
♦AQJ5
♣QT963
|
♠QJ92
♥K7
♦T862
♣A84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣3 ♦3/4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 3♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 5♦* W -1 ♥A A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A6-Mortin-Dunitz
50 0.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 ♦3 A2-Keim-Larrivee vs A7-Gaucher-Cooney
50 0.50 1.50 5♦ W -1 ♥A A5-Rankin-McLeod vs A1-Fluter-Nattrass
|
| |
25 |
♠AKT3
♥74
♦AJT7
♣852
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠65
♥AQJ932
♦62
♣J43
|
♠97
♥K5
♦KQ3
♣AKQT97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣1 ♥1 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 3♣ E +1 ♦8 A3-Spence-Krukoff vs A1-Fluter-Nattrass
650 0.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 ♠A A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A7-Gaucher-Cooney
650 0.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 ♠A A6-Mortin-Dunitz vs A2-Keim-Larrivee
|
| |
26 |
♠92
♥K8743
♦JT7
♣T93
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠Q
♥AQ6
♦K96532
♣K87
|
♠T4
♥T952
♦A8
♣AQ654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣1 ♦2 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 4♥ ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.50 0.50 4♣ E +1 ♠A A3-Spence-Krukoff vs A1-Fluter-Nattrass
150 1.50 0.50 3♣ E +2 ♠4 A6-Mortin-Dunitz vs A2-Keim-Larrivee
600 0.00 2.00 5♦ W ♠9 A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A7-Gaucher-Cooney
|
| |
27 |
♠QT643
♥A532
♦9
♣864
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠J
♥KQJT86
♦KQ73
♣52
|
♠AK85
♥7
♦J6
♣AKQJT9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 6♣ E -2 ♦A A3-Spence-Krukoff vs A1-Fluter-Nattrass
460 0.50 1.50 3N W +2 ♠6 A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A7-Gaucher-Cooney
460 0.50 1.50 3N E +2 ♦5 A6-Mortin-Dunitz vs A2-Keim-Larrivee
|
| |
28 |
♠7
♥K754
♦AT732
♣QT9
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠K95
♥QJ82
♦KQ
♣J654
|
♠AT86432
♥AT
♦96
♣83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3/2♦ ♥6 ♠3/2 NT4 |
EW: 4♠ 2/3NT ♣5/6 ♦4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♠ E +2 ♣A A6-Mortin-Dunitz vs A2-Keim-Larrivee
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ E ♣A A8-Duczek-Seymour vs A7-Gaucher-Cooney
450 0.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 ♣K A3-Spence-Krukoff vs A1-Fluter-Nattrass
|
| |